Archive for October 4, 2011

WILL KENYA’S SCIENTISTS DEBATE ON GMO?

October 4, 2011

WILL KENYA’S SCIENTISTS DEBATE ON GMO?

Erle Frayne D. Argonza

Should Kenya continue with the policy of grains importation to meet its food security goals? More importantly, should genetically modified maize be imported on a sustained or prolonged basis?

It seems that the GMO controversy has hit the African republic hard enough that fears over GMO’s adverse effects on human consumers have generated policy conflicts of sorts. Climate change is creating new ecological challenges on food production, and this has spared nary a country including Kenya.

Below is a SciDev.net summary report on the urgency for the GM debate in Kenya.

[Philippines, 03 October 2011]
Source: http://www.scidev.net/en/agriculture-and-environment/gm-crops/news/kenya-s-scientists-urged-to-engage-in-gm-debate.html
Kenya’s scientists urged to engage in GM debate
Maina Waruru
16 September 2011
[NAIROBI] Kenya’s agriculture secretary is urging researchers to join the debate on genetically modified (GM) foods — and not leave the issues to politicians.
Wilson Songa, who is also a practising scientist, said that, by keeping quiet, scientists are putting the public at risk of being misled by politicians.
There has been fierce debate at a high level about allowing the import of GM maize to improve food security, and some politicians have claimed that GM foods are harmful.
“Our research institutions have experts who can educate the public and save them from dangerous propaganda,” said Songa. With the Horn of Africa faced with severe drought and crippling food shortages, he said scientists should inform the public of alternative options.
“We [scientists] must no longer be cowed into silence as our people face starvation year in year out while politicians make wild allegations,” he said.
Songa was speaking at the fellowships awards ceremony for African Women in Agricultural Research and Development last month (18 August). He said scientists feared being seen to contradict ministers and policymakers.
Shaukat Abdulrazak, head of the National Council for Science and Technology (NCST), told SciDev.Net that scientific bodies such as the Kenya Agriculture Research Institute (KARI) and the National Biosafety Authority must educate the public, but stressed that this should be about the drawbacks of GM crops as well as their benefits.
“Scientists have a responsibility to link science with society. They must be proactive and inform the public on the pros and cons of GM technology. They must engage politicians and provide facts and figures for them,” he said.
Abdulrazak said that although scientists have been commenting on GM organisms (GMOs), it has been mainly within their ‘comfort zone’ — classrooms and conferences. “When scientists engage in public debate there is a suspicion that they are interested in politics,” he said.
He said that Kenyans are yet to have confidence in the ability of their scientific institutions to deal with the pressure from abroad to introduce GM foods.
But Shem Wandiga, managing trustee at the Centre for Science and Technology Innovations in Kenya, which is associated with UNESCO (UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), said that rather than fearing to enter the GM debate, scientists are avoiding “unnecessary controversy”.
Wandiga said that the civilised approach would be for governments and policymakers to seek the opinion of scientists, which would then be given in a “sober manner”.
“But when politicians shoot from the hip like they have been doing in this case, then we do not want to get sucked into the mess.
“It is not that Kenya lacks scientists that can give advice but when there are vested interests, like in the GM maize importation, then we do not need to get involved,” he said.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
PEACE, DEVELOPMENT & SOCIETY LINKS:
http://erleargonza.blogspot.com, https://unladtau.wordpress.com, http://www.facebook.com, http://www.newciv.org, http://sta.rtup.biz, http://magicalsecretgarden.socialparadox.com, http://en.netlog.com/erlefrayne, http://www.blogster.com/erleargonza, http://www.articlesforfree.net, http://ipeace.us, http://internationalpeaceandconflict.org, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza, http://erleargonza.seekopia.com, http://lovingenergies.spruz.com, http://multiply.com/erleargonza, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza, http://talangguro.blogfree.net

G20 WARMS UP ON FOOD SECURITY RESEARCH

October 4, 2011

G20 WARMS UP ON FOOD SECURITY RESEARCH

Erle Frayne D. Argonza

There is a good news coming from the stakeholders of the G20 nations: the enthusiasm on food security research. This is a most welcome move, and let’s hope for sustained action on funding, launching and disseminating food security research & development results.

This is not to say that food security has been outside the ambit of science discourse among G20 nations. It was on the plate of options in the past, though it played second fiddle to industrial agenda and global trade reforms. Besides, there were the peace & development studies aimed at eradicating terrorism and organized crime in the long run.

With the Millenium Development Goal and post-Kyoto Protocol at the backdrop of worldwide guides to state policies and executory measures, the G20 has finally shown a warmer reception to food security research. Land use patterns across the globe have shown a general deterioration of soil fertility and utility due to monocropping and inorganic inputs, while genetic engineering has offered new opportunities for sustainable grains and livestock production.

Below is a report from the SciDev.net about the latest G20 initiatives on food security research.

[Philippines, 03 October 2011]

Source: http://www.scidev.net/en/agriculture-and-environment/food-security/news/g20-nations-turn-to-agricultural-research-for-food-security.html
G20 nations turn to agricultural research for food security
Yojana Sharma
16 September 2011
The G20 group of major economies has for the first time put international agricultural research on its agenda, in an effort to take a long-term view on the fight for food security.
The group’s first meeting on the topic has endorsed the key role of agricultural research not only in preventing global food crises, but also in making an effective contribution to economic growth.
The meeting, taking place in Montpellier, France, this week (12–14 September), is being hosted by the French presidency of the G20 — the group of finance ministers and central bank governors from 20 major economies. It involved representatives of international development organisations including the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the UN and the World Bank.
“It is the first time the G20 has actively put international agricultural research on its agenda,” said Mark Holderness, executive secretary of the Global Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR), and one of the conference rapporteurs. “That is a big step in itself — the G20 countries have recognised that [agricultural research has] a wider economic relevance.”
Although food security shot to the top of the political agenda during the 2008 food riots, “people put in a rapid response … there was no political buy-in to have a long-term view,” Holderness told SciDev.Net.
“We have had another price spike and the World Bank is predicting another because food stocks are dwindling and there isn’t the capacity in the system — we need to increase food productivity to meet that need.”
According to the meeting’s draft summary document, research systems in the G20 countries that help increase agricultural productivity can “contribute decisively to the improvement of food security” in the developing world through “improved coherence and coordination, stronger and equal partnerships and better knowledge sharing”.
The G20 countries have been described as “a powerhouse of both agricultural innovation and production, with around 70 per cent of scientific publications on agriculture, and around 60 per cent of agricultural exports,” said a paper for the conference prepared by Brazil, Canada, France and Japan, together with international organisations including the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), the World Bank and the FAO.
“We are not going to have global-scale research for development without appropriate scientific partnerships,” said Anne-Marie Izac, CGIAR chief science officer and another rapporteur.
The meeting also recognised the need for foresight studies to improve preparedness.
Izac said that foresight did not mean just being prepared for emergencies, but asking the research questions “which may not be urgent now, but are nonetheless essential for food security in a dynamic, constantly changing environment”.
The CGIAR’s Independent Science and Partnership Council advises donors on future scenarios, but foresight studies are “not yet embedded in the international agricultural research system”, acknowledged Izac.
France’s minister for cooperation Henri de Raincourt said the meeting’s outcomes would be taken into account at the G20 meeting of finance and development ministers in Washington DC, United States, next week (23–24 September) before the G20 Summit in November in France.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@PEACE, DEVELOPMENT & SOCIETY LINKS:
http://erleargonza.blogspot.com, https://unladtau.wordpress.com, http://www.facebook.com, http://www.newciv.org, http://sta.rtup.biz, http://magicalsecretgarden.socialparadox.com, http://en.netlog.com/erlefrayne, http://www.blogster.com/erleargonza, http://articlesforfree.com, http://ipeace.us, http://internationalpeaceandconflict.org, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza, http://erleargonza.seekopia.com, http://lovingenergies.spruz.com, http://multiply.com/erleargonza, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza

CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

October 4, 2011

CHALLENGES & OPPORTUNITIES TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Erle Frayne D. Argonza

Attaining development in the ‘sustainable’ criterion is a truly daunting task. Two development paths were traversed in the 20th century, with the USSR and USA serving as polarity of exemplars: socialism (statist) and capitalism (unbridled market). Extreme in their approaches to development, both models are now seen as unsustainable in the long run.

A hybridization of the two models is now taking place in China and Vietnam that have recharted their development compass along a social market route. Whether this model can be sustained in the long run remains to be observed.

Meantime, the following problematic concerns face the world community: poverty and inequality, climate change, food and energy security. They pose new challenges and opportunities as well. Solving all of them in a very integrated fashion is the big challenge of the day. They are key to sustainable development that must be pursued at the same time that results will dovetail on improving human development (longevity/health, literacy/education, gender empowerment).

Below is a lecture by Rebecca Grynspan, UN Undersecretary-General and UNDP Associate Administrator, about the subject matter. Update reports on poverty alleviation across the globe is fittingly shared to us by the noblesse lady.

[Philippines, 01 October 2011]
Source: http://www.beta.undp.org/undp/en/home/presscenter/speeches/2011/09/16/rebeca-grynspan-towards-sustainable-development-new-challenges-and-opportunities.html
Rebeca Grynspan: Towards sustainable development: New challenges and opportunities
16 September 2011
University Lecture by Rebeca Grynspan,
UN Under-Secretary-General and UNDP Associate Administrator
Towards Sustainable Development: New Challenges and Opportunities
Peking University, Friday 16 September 2011
I am pleased to join you today on this, my first visit to China as Associate Administrator of the UN Development Programme.
Over the last three days, I’ve had the chance to meet with officials and Chinese people, from farmers to women leaders; to travel around Beijing and Tianjin, attend the World Economic Forum in Dalian; and witness some of the extensive development progress being made here in China.
It is now a privilege to join you here at Peking University – a university that is renowned not only in China but also throughout the world for its high standards of teaching and learning. I am especially gratified to have the opportunity to meet with talented young people from across China to talk about one of the most critical issues of our time – sustainable development.
I chose to focus my remarks on inclusive and sustainable development because it allows us to discuss some of the biggest challenges that both China and the world face – poverty and inequality, climate change, food and energy security– in an integrated manner. This is important because, in practice, reducing poverty and inequality, generating growth, advancing social development and sustainability are interconnected: in pursuing one, we can advance, slow, or stall progress in the other. To get all of them moving in the same direction, we need to understand and harness the connections between them.
Doing so offers the potential of delivering multiple dividends by reducing environmental degradation, creating jobs, and alleviating poverty.
In my remarks, I draw out some of the connections between these objectives, discuss progress towards them both in China and around the world, and suggest an integrated way forward.
I will say upfront, however, that there are not necessarily easy answers to our most profound questions, including
• How can we best expand the benefits of growth while limiting carbon emissions and protecting our natural resources?
• How do we avoid climate catastrophes that set back development prospects, particularly for the poorest?
What we do know, however, is that economic progress and poverty reduction cannot be sustained if the ecosystems on which we depend are irreparably damaged. We have no alternative but to pursue our objectives jointly through an integrated and renewed agenda for sustainable development.
Progress toward inclusive growth
The world has experienced enormous economic progress: in the past three decades, per capita income worldwide has almost doubled . Poverty reduction, particularly in Asia, has been similarly impressive. The absolute number of poor people living on $1.25 a day in Asia declined from 1.7 billion in 1981 to 753 million in 2008.
This means Asia lifted over 900 million people out of poverty in the last 27 years. This is mainly due to the remarkable success of China which alone lifted over 500 million people out of poverty in the same period, and has made one of the fastest increases in human development in the last 40 years.
Yet, there is no automatic link between economic growth and poverty reduction. Even in the fastest growing economies, economic benefits have not been consistently translated into poverty reduction. Recent studies also show that in the past two decades the poverty-reducing impact of economic growth has slowed, especially in Asia.
Asia’s dynamic economic performance has benefited many hundreds of millions of people, but it has also brought challenges – including inequality, environmental destruction, and geographic, ethnic, and gender disparities. We know inequality can grow while poverty decreases, so we need to put attention to both.
The Asian experience, in particular, has been marked by rising income inequality. During the last two decades, inequality in terms of Gini coefficient increased in 11 countries in the region, including China.
Progress worldwide has also been uneven, between and within countries. China’s dramatic progress in poverty reduction means that globally, the world is on track to reduce poverty by half by 2015. But of the 84 countries with available data on Millennium Development Goals, only 45 are on track to meet the target.
To overcome such challenges and advance human development, the quality of growth matters. That was a major finding of a review conducted last year by UNDP. In examining forty years of human development progress around the world, the review reinforced the results of earlier studies, finding that growth in per capita income is not strongly correlated to improvements in health and education.
Positive synergies, on the other hand, were identified between equity-promoting policies and human development. The review concluded that, to contribute to human development, it was important for growth to be both inclusive and sustainable. To take this lesson forward, UNDP works with its government partners to design policies and interventions which can advance growth which is both inclusive and sustainable.
Through inclusive growth, countries expand the number of people who participate productively in the economy as well as the number who benefit from its growth. To promote inclusive growth, countries can stimulate the sectors where the poor work, generate employment and expand infrastructure in the areas where the poor live, and increase access to safe water, sanitation, and reliable energy. Services also need to reach remote areas and be made available to those who are too often excluded. Attention to the vulnerable non-poor working group is also a concern, specially youth and women unemployment and economic opportunities.
Ethnic and linguistic minorities, for example, fare worse in most indicators of the world’s Millennium Development Goals. Taken together, these groups make up a sizable proportion of the world’s poor. Gender equality across the MDGs is also a matter deserving attention, so we need to be wary of focusing on averages as they can lead countries to miss the very divergences – in gender, ethnicity, sub-region etc –that we seek to overcome.
China’s leaders understand the importance of inclusive growth. The 12th Five-Year Plan spells out a detailed plan to advance inclusive growth. Importantly, it gives strong emphasis to increasing the wealth of the people as the wealth of the country. Indeed, President Hu Jintao’s call for a “harmonious society” recognises the risks of growing inequalities.
UNDP is working closely with China, sharing good practices and experiences around the world which have expanded opportunities and reduce inequalities. For example, UNDP works with Chinese Ministries in promoting social inclusion for migrant workers and their families, to seek to make sure they can access social services in China’s urban areas. We are also working with China to enhance women’s inclusion in the labour market. As the recent Asia-Pacific Human Development Report indicated, the ‘lost GDP’ in the region as a result of female exclusion from the labour market amounts to $89 billion. So including women is not only the right thing to do but also the SMART thing to do.
Progress towards sustainable growth
It is also important that growth is made sustainable, in order to increase resilience to external shocks and protect development gains. Social protection systems are an important investment in sustainability, as they shield the most vulnerable from the worst effects of shocks and can help prevent irreversible development setbacks.
Home grown social protection systems, if designed well, expand opportunities, build domestic demand, and spur human development.
Recent food, financial, and economic crises have made their value clear. Studies suggest that pre-existing social protection regimes had a measurable impact in helping the poor cope with the impact of the global economic crisis, for example, finding in particular that social protection systems enabled families to keep their children in school, avoiding long term welfare losses.
Basic protection programs are also affordable. The estimates of a social protection floor range around 2 per cent of GDP. Despite this, only about 20 per cent of the world’s working age population – mostly in middle- and upper- income countries -have effective access to comprehensive social protection systems. As China’s leaders have acknowledged, China’s own social protection schemes do not provide quality coverage to all China’s citizens. China has however set ambitious targets for universal social protection coverage by 2020 and is increasingly expanding healthcare insurance provision.
Environmental protection is also critical. Depleted or polluted natural resources, increasingly volatile weather patterns, and more frequent natural disasters can impede development progress and even cause reversals, particularly for the poorest people.
For many developing countries, the annual economic burden from poor environment-related health outcomes amounts to 2–4 percent of GDP.
According to the World Health Organization, 24 percent of the overall burden of disease worldwide, and 23 percent of all deaths, can be prevented through environmental interventions, especially improvements in water, sanitation, hygiene and indoor and urban air quality. Today, environment related health problems such as diarrhea, malaria, and acute respiratory infections remain the top killers of children under five in developing countries.
Every year, two million deaths—mostly women and children—die as a result of indoor air pollution from household use of traditional biomass fuels and coal. Malnutrition, an important contributor to child mortality, is often due as much or more to unsafe water, bad sanitation and disease than to insufficient food production.
Unfortunately progress worldwide is mixed, at best. The data shows that we are depleting the planet’s natural assets at an unsustainable rate: deserts are spreading; water scarcity is increasing; tropical forests are shrinking; and the list is growing.
Looming above these threats, and exacerbating them, is climate change, spurred on by the relentless increase in global consumption of fossil fuels, which began with the Industrial Revolution.
More than two-thirds of global greenhouse gas emissions are due to human use of energy. Investing in energy efficiency and renewable energy yields significant returns with multiple beneficial impacts – not just on carbon emissions but for the economy as a whole.
It is possible to cut energy consumption in cities by 20–30 percent without sacrificing growth. In fact “green investment” can create many jobs and thus stimulate growth and poverty reduction. China is now the second largest producer of wind power in the world and the biggest exporter of photo-voltaic solar panels. China’s renewable energy sector employs 1.5 million people alone – 1.5 million people who were not working in this sector a decade ago.
China has shown leadership in establishing national policies that incentivize green growth, setting rigorous targets for energy efficiency and energy conservation, and making significant and growing investments in renewable energy.
Globally, at the recent Vienna Energy Forum held in June this year, the UN system advocated for a package of three simultaneous global energy goals by 2030: universal energy access, 40% energy intensity reduction and 30% renewable energy in the global energy mix. Pursued together, they can truly make energy a means for sustainable development.
Moving to low-carbon development
There are many ways countries can transition to cleaner, low -carbon, and climate-resilient economies, which also generate inclusive growth and reduce poverty. But achieving them often requires bold steps and a willingness to turn old development models on their head.
For example, gone are the days when clearing the world’s great forests for other land uses can be regarded as synonymous with development.

Far sighted governments, including in Indonesia, Brazil are working to put the United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (REDD+) into action. This innovative scheme links development gains to forest preservation, not to forest clearance. Already we have seen the success of this approach in Brazil, where deforestation rates have fallen sharply.
Business can and must also be a part of the solution. The proliferation of green certification systems indicates that future markets will demand greater compliance with environmentally and socially responsible standards. UNDP helps connect communities and businesses contributing to environmentally responsible development. In Ghana, for example, UNDP facilitated a partnership between the government and Kraft-Cadbury which helps local farmers adopt sustainable agricultural practices and increase their incomes. And in China, UNDP worked with Government to transform the market for environmental technologies, from solar water heaters to eco-friendly refrigerators, to energy-efficient light bulbs.
There are no simple blueprints to follow. We need to identify good practice and learn by doing. China has many lessons learned, technologies, and other resources that can help countries pursue low carbon development paths.
But to scale up, new climate financing, incentivized through a carbon market, will be needed to channel sufficient levels of investment into low-emissions infrastructure and technology. It will be critical that developed countries honour their commitments made in Copenhagen and Cancun to mobilize $100 billion per year by 2020 to support climate change mitigation and adaptation in developing countries.
So let me turn now to the adaptation to climate change challenge.
Adapting to climate change
Extreme weather events associated with climate change are occurring with increased frequency and are disproportionately affecting the poor.
China has certainly had its share of those extreme weather events:
• Already this year in China floods have affected 36 million people and killed over 200.
• Yet, elsewhere in China drought has left fourteen million residents short of drinking water.
The longer term impacts of climate change are adding to existing vulnerabilities around the world.
It has been estimated that if we do not change our ways, by 2080 an additional 600 million people worldwide may face malnutrition and an additional 1.8 billion people – more than the current population of China and the USA together – may face water shortages.
Developed countries see the importance of adapting to climate change and have the capacity and resources to invest heavily in infrastructure. According to the Global Human Development Report (2007/2008), the UK spends US$ 1.2 billion annually on flood defence. In contrast, funding for adaptation in Least Developed Countries amounted to US$26 million, equivalent to one week’s worth of spending in the UK flood defence programme.
This illustrates why it’s important to consider energy and climate change, environmental protection and food security in an integrated fashion.
China is doing just this by planting the seeds of a climate resilient, low carbon emitting agricultural sector. Through large-scale erosion control, agro-forestry and other agricultural innovations, farmers can increase their productivity, restore ecosystems, and make the landscape more resilient to floods and drought.
Bringing the local and global together
Twenty years ago in 1992, at the UN Conference on Environment and Development, held in Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, world leaders acknowledged the extent of environmental destruction caused by humans and set forth an agenda for change. It was a significant milestone on the road to sustainable development.
Eight months from now, in June 2012, world leaders will gather again in Rio for the UN Conference on Sustainable Development – to review progress over the last 20 years and determine what is needed to ensure a sustainable future going forward. It is critical that the world use the ‘Rio+20’ conference to renew its commitment to sustainable development, addressing not only carbon emissions but the broader issues of sustainable development, many of which we have touched on here. I commend the example set by China just last week, in hosting over 30 countries for an exchange of views on priorities for Rio plus 20; we will need more such opportunities for dialogue in the months ahead.
Business as usual, which leads to broken ecosystems and a warming climate, as well as to growing inequality, will increase poverty and hardship. It will destabilize economies, breed insecurity in many countries and undermine our goals for sustainable development.
We must, therefore grow green. China is well placed to show this in words and deeds. As the largest developing country in the world, offering its own sizeable support to other developing countries, China is in a unique position to inspire and promote sustainable development not only at home, but abroad.
In recognition of this, the Government of China and UNDP recently signed an agreement to strengthen our cooperation to share China’s experience and knowledge with other developing countries. China’s experience and its ongoing innovations can save other developing countries much needed time and expense in designing their own low-emission, climate-resilient paths. UNDP stands ready to use its global network to help facilitate and support all such efforts.
If current generations fail to address our urgent challenges, future generations will suffer the consequences. It’s important that in tackling our challenges we hear the voices of young people, such as yourselves, on whom the responsibility for future decisions will fall – and by whom the impact of today’s decisions will be felt.
Our individual initiatives will only add up to collective progress if the right technologies, institutions and incentives are in place. This requires visionary leadership willing to defend longer term goals and invest in green growth. Such leadership, political will and commitment are not created in a vacuum – they are propelled by public opinion and collective support.

The decades and generations in the future will look back to us and at this time now as a turning point. It is now more critical than ever for us to understand the connections between poverty reduction, generating growth, advancing social development, and achieving sustainability. If we wish to avoid undermining the gains we have made in reducing poverty in the last few decades, we must focus on the quality of growth to ensure it results in human development. We must ensure progress does not create the inequalities or divergences we are seeking to overcome. We must have the vision and the will to transform old development models and invest in social and environmental protection schemes to build resilience and shield the most vulnerable from external shocks. We are cognizant of this tremendous responsibility and of our individual and collective role in making the most of the enormous opportunity for change that it provides. We need to do more than simply understand the connections, we must act on them. As students now and as future leaders in whichever field you choose – I hope you are able to take this vision of sustainable development, and incorporate it in your actions, choices and decisions – wherever you find yourselves. Remembering the wise words of an old proverb, “We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children”.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
PEACE, DEVELOPMENT & SOCIETY LINKS:
http://erleargonza.blogspot.com, https://unladtau.wordpress.com, http://www.facebook.com, http://www.newciv.org, http://sta.rtup.biz, http://magicalsecretgarden.socialparadox.com, http://en.netlog.com/erlefrayne, http://www.blogster.com/erleargonza, http://www.articlesforfree.net, http://ipeace.us, http://internationalpeaceandconflict.org, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza, http://erleargonza.seekopia.com, http://lovingenergies.spruz.com, http://multiply.com/erleargonza, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza, http://talangguro.blogfree.net

INTERNATIONAL DEMOCRACY DAY HIGHLIGHTS

October 4, 2011

INTERNATIONAL DEMOCRACY DAY HIGHLIGHTS

Erle Frayne D. Argonza

Warm greetings to fellow global citizens!

September 15 was marked as the celebration of the International Democracy Day. In Latin America, this was correspondingly met with a summit on regional security by Latin American countries. Just about couples of weeks before that, the ASEAN convened for its annual consensus-building with the extra highlight of dialogue between the ASEAN and China.

International democracy is not just about forging stronger democratic governance for each state across the globe. Such a pattern has in fact seemed to be the compass of governance, as former tyrannies disheveled while Arab dictatorships are facing militant regime-change rebels in the MENA.

International democracy also refers to the conduct of nation-states in their day-to-day interaction with each other. The world lacks a global government to serve as central institutional administrative hub, so we have to contend with an ‘anarchy of nation-states’ now and in the foreseeable future. In the absence of global government, we all have to do with treaties and covenants, from binding to non-binding ones, and observe civility in our conduct across the borders.

New power arrangements are now being crafted, as the shift from unilateral power hegemon to multi-polar arrangement is taking place. That is truly a difficult road to traverse, though a viable one at the least. For as long as we are all talking with each other across borders, we can forge international democracy in its widest latitude possible.

Below are some highlights of the latest celebration as reported by the UNDP.

[Philippines, 01 October 2011]
Source: http://www.beta.undp.org/undp/en/home/presscenter/articles/2011/09/15/international-day-of-democracy.html
International Day of Democracy
15 September 2011

Democratic governance is a cornerstone of the United Nations Development Programme’s work, instrumental to empowering nations and communities in 177 countries and territories around the world and advancing the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
Our results
Fostering inclusive participation
For the January 2011 Southern Sudan Referendum, UNDP worked through the UN Integrated Referendum and Electoral Division to:
• manage donor funds of more than US$56 million in international assistance;
• procure 3,160 registration kits, 7.5 million ballots and 8,500 polling booths;
• deliver polling materials via commercial trucks, helicopters and air drops.
UNDP also supported voter education and media training, and deployed more than 500 electoral observers to 62 counties during the voter registration period. More results >
Promoting responsive governing institutions
In Georgia, UNDP supported the Legal Aid Service in opening 11 offices and three consultation centres across the country, near populations most in need of legal services. In 2010, the service received more than 20,000 applications for assistance. UNDP also supported training of lawyers and the public on civil rights. More results >
Mainstreaming international principles
In Afghanistan, women won 27 percent of parliamentary seats, exceeding a 25 percent quota reserved for them at September 2010 elections, following a programme of UNDP electoral assistance that included awareness raising and training on gender-related issues. More results >
Our stories
Record number of voters ready
A record number of more than 7.3 million Guatemalans registered to vote ahead of Guatemala’s presidential elections on 11 September. More
More than 30 million Congolese register to vote
UNDP trained some 31,000 Electoral Commission and temporary staff to conduct various functions for the upcoming presidential and assembly vote, including registration and updates to the existing register. More
TV production to boost youth civic participation
A mass media campaign in Cambodia empowers young adults aged 15-24, targeting three million of voting age ahead of local elections next year and a national election in 2013. More
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
PEACE, DEVELOPMENT & SOCIETY LINKS:
http://erleargonza.blogspot.com, https://unladtau.wordpress.com, http://www.facebook.com, http://www.newciv.org, http://sta.rtup.biz, http://magicalsecretgarden.socialparadox.com, http://en.netlog.com/erlefrayne, http://www.blogster.com/erleargonza, http://www.articlesforfree.net, http://ipeace.us, http://internationalpeaceandconflict.org, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza, http://erleargonza.seekopia.com, http://lovingenergies.spruz.com, http://multiply.com/erleargonza, http://www.blogleaf.com/erleargonza, http://talangguro.blogfree.net